How to Reduce LLM Inference Costs by 80% in 2026

The $50K Problem

Here's a scenario we see regularly: a startup runs Llama 3.1 70B on AWS using a p4d.24xlarge instance (8× A100 40 GB GPUs). Their monthly bill? $23,510. That's $282K/year for a single inference endpoint.

The problem? They only need 2 of those 8 GPUs. The model is running in FP16 when INT4 would work fine. They're not batching requests. And they're paying AWS egress fees on every response.

Most teams applying just a few strategies from this guide see 60–80% savings. Teams that go all-in — right-sizing, quantizing, batching, and switching to consumer hardware — can push past 90%. The team above ended up running the same model for $706/month on VectorLay. Same quality. Same throughput. Your results will depend on your starting point, but the savings are real regardless.

Let's break down exactly how.

Strategy 1: Right-Size Your GPU

The most common mistake in GPU cloud is over-provisioning. Teams default to the biggest GPU available because they don't want to deal with OOM errors. But for inference, you only need enough VRAM to hold the model weights plus a KV-cache buffer.

Action item: Profile your model's actual VRAM usage with nvidia-smi during peak load. If you're using less than 70% of your GPU's VRAM, you're overpaying. Downgrade to a smaller GPU or add more models to the same instance.

Strategy 2: Quantize Your Models

Quantization reduces the precision of model weights from 16-bit floating point (FP16) to 8-bit or 4-bit integers. This halves or quarters your VRAM usage with minimal quality loss for inference.

Modern quantization methods are remarkably good:

Our recommendation: Use AWQ 4-bit for production inference. It's the fastest 4-bit method, has excellent vLLM support, and the quality loss is imperceptible for most chat and text generation tasks.

# Serve an AWQ-quantized 70B model on 2× GPUs
vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-AWQ \
  --quantization awq \
  --tensor-parallel-size 2 \
  --max-model-len 4096 \
  --gpu-memory-utilization 0.9

Strategy 3: Use Continuous Batching

Naive inference serves one request at a time. Continuous batching (also called "in-flight batching") serves dozens of requests simultaneously by interleaving their token generation. This multiplies your throughput by 5–10× without adding GPUs.

Here's the difference:

Frameworks that support continuous batching: vLLM (recommended), TensorRT-LLM, text-generation-inference (TGI), and SGLang. We recommend vLLM for most use cases—it's open-source, fast, and has the best quantization support.

Strategy 4: Switch to Consumer GPUs

This is the single biggest cost lever for inference workloads. Datacenter GPUs (A100, H100) are designed for training: they have HBM memory for bandwidth, NVLink for multi-GPU communication, and ECC for data integrity. Most of these features are unnecessary for inference.

For inference, what matters is:

The RTX 4090 delivers 4× more TFLOPS than an A100 while costing 7× less per hour. For inference workloads that fit in 24 GB of VRAM, there's no rational reason to use datacenter GPUs.

Strategy 5: Use Distributed Inference for Large Models

When your model doesn't fit on a single GPU, you have two options: buy one massive expensive GPU or shard the model across multiple cheaper ones. Distributed inference makes the second option not just viable but superior.

Tensor parallelism splits model layers across GPUs. With vLLM or TensorRT-LLM, this is a single command-line flag. The framework handles all the inter-GPU communication automatically.

VectorLay takes this further with its overlay network architecture. Your model is sharded across multiple nodes, and if one node fails, VectorLay automatically replaces it without dropping requests. You get the cost of consumer hardware with the reliability of enterprise infrastructure.

Strategy 6: Eliminate Hidden Infrastructure Costs

On hyperscalers, the GPU is just the beginning. Here's what actually shows up on your AWS bill when running inference:

That's an extra $154/month in hidden costs on AWS—an 18% premium on top of the GPU price. And this is a conservative estimate. High-traffic endpoints with lots of egress can see hidden costs exceed the GPU cost.

The Complete Picture: Before and After

Let's put it all together with a realistic scenario: a startup running Llama 3.1 70B for a customer-facing chatbot.

Even if you only apply strategies 1 and 4 (right-size + consumer GPUs), you'll see 50–60% savings. Add quantization and batching, and you're looking at 80%+. The numbers speak for themselves.

Quick Wins: Your Optimization Checklist