VectorLay vs SaladCloud
SaladCloud is VectorLay's closest competitor — both use distributed consumer GPUs for AI inference. But the architectures differ significantly. Here's how they compare on reliability, performance, and price.
TL;DR
- →Both use distributed consumer GPUs — similar pricing model
- →VectorLay has true fault tolerance — overlay network with automatic failover
- →SaladCloud focuses on specific verticals — transcription, image gen, voice AI
- →VectorLay offers container-level isolation — Kata Containers with GPU passthrough
The Closest Competition
VectorLay and SaladCloud share a fundamental insight: consumer GPUs sitting idle in gaming PCs and workstations represent massive untapped compute. Both platforms aggregate this distributed GPU power and sell it as cloud inference at prices that undercut traditional data center providers.
But the similarities end at the surface. The architecture underneath — how each platform handles reliability, security, routing, and isolation — differs significantly.
Architecture: The Key Difference
SaladCloud operates a task-queue model. Jobs are submitted to a pool of available GPUs, and SaladCloud's scheduler assigns them to healthy nodes. If a node goes offline, the job fails and must be resubmitted. This works well for batch workloads (image generation, transcription) but can be problematic for latency-sensitive real-time inference.
VectorLay operates an overlay network. Your container runs on multiple GPU nodes simultaneously, and VectorLay's routing layer directs traffic to healthy nodes in real-time. If a node fails, requests are instantly rerouted — no job resubmission, no downtime, no manual intervention. This is true fault tolerance, not just job retry.
What This Means in Practice
Imagine you're running a real-time chatbot. On SaladCloud, if the GPU node processing your request drops offline, that request fails. Your application needs retry logic, and the user sees latency.
On VectorLay, the same scenario is invisible. The overlay network detects the failure via heartbeat monitoring and routes the next request to a healthy node in milliseconds. Your chatbot keeps responding. Your users notice nothing.
Security Model
Running untrusted workloads on consumer GPUs requires robust isolation. SaladCloud uses Docker containers for workload isolation. VectorLay goes a step further with Kata Containers — lightweight VMs that provide hardware-level isolation via VFIO GPU passthrough. This means your model weights and data are protected by CPU virtualization extensions, not just Linux namespaces.
Pricing Comparison
| GPU | VectorLay | SaladCloud |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 4090 (24GB) | $0.49/hr | ~$0.25-0.50/hr |
| RTX 3090 (24GB) | $0.29/hr | ~$0.15-0.30/hr |
| RTX 3080 (10GB) | $0.19/hr | ~$0.10-0.20/hr |
SaladCloud pricing is approximate and varies by demand. Both platforms price competitively for consumer GPUs. The price difference is small — the real differentiator is architecture.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | VectorLay | SaladCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Fault Tolerance | Overlay network — automatic rerouting | Job retry on failure |
| Isolation | Kata Containers (VM-level) | Docker containers |
| Deployment Model | Bring your own container | Container or API-based |
| Real-time Inference | Optimized — persistent routing | Batch-optimized |
| Enterprise GPUs | H100, A100 available | Consumer GPUs only |
| Pre-built APIs | Container-first approach | Transcription, image gen APIs |
When to Choose SaladCloud
- Batch workloads where occasional failures are acceptable
- Want pre-built APIs for transcription or image generation
- Absolute lowest cost is the only priority
When to Choose VectorLay
- Production inference that needs high reliability
- Real-time inference (chatbots, APIs) where downtime isn't acceptable
- Need stronger security isolation (Kata Containers vs Docker)
- Want both consumer AND enterprise GPUs in one platform
- Need auto-failover without building retry logic into your app
Bottom Line
SaladCloud and VectorLay start from the same premise — distributed consumer GPUs are the future of affordable AI compute. But VectorLay's overlay network architecture delivers genuine fault tolerance that SaladCloud's task-queue model can't match.
If you're running batch jobs and can tolerate occasional failures, SaladCloud is a viable option. If you need production-grade reliability for real-time inference, VectorLay is the stronger choice. Add in Kata Container isolation and enterprise GPU availability, and VectorLay is the more complete platform.
Distributed GPUs, done right
VectorLay: consumer GPU pricing with enterprise-grade fault tolerance.
Get Started Free